New Era Curriculum: Offline and Online Interactive Learning Has Been Effective ?
Abstract
This look at objectives to determine: (1) differences in English studying effects among students who are taught the use of on line and offline getting to know media, (2) variations in mastering effects for college students who've open and closed interpersonal communication, (3) interactions between using learning media and interpersonal verbal exchange in influencing students' English gaining knowledge of outcomes. The quasi-experimental research method and through the necessities had been used, the research speculation has been tested the usage of 2-way ANOVA at a significance degree of α = 0.05 formerly executed the normality necessities test with Lilifors and the homogeneity of variance test with the Barlett take a look at and Fisher's check. The consequences of testing the hypothesis had been received: (1) the getting to know consequences of college students who are taught English the use of on-line studying media are better than offline learning media, that is indicated by means of Fcount = 6.596 Ftable = three.94, (2) the learning consequences of students who've open interpersonal communication has been better than closed interpersonal this is shown by Fcount = eleven.18 > Ftable = 3.94, and (three) there has been an interplay between the use of educational media and interpersonal conversation in influencing English studying outcomes, specifically Fcount = 68.38 Ftable = 3 ,94.
References
2. Arikunto, S. (2008). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek Edisi Revisi V. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
3. Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
4. Arsyad, A. (2005). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
5. Borg. R. W. and Gall M. D. (2015). Educational Research, An Introduction, Fifth Edition: Longman.
6. Dabbagh, N. and Ritland. B. B. (2015). Online Learning, Concepts, Strategies And Application. Ohio: Pearson.
7. DeVito. Joseph A. (2019). Komunikasi Antarmanusia Edisi Kelima. Alih Bahasa Maulana. Agus. Tangerang Selatan : Karisma
8. Dick. W and Carey. L (2015). The Systematic Design of Instruction Six Edition. USA: Pearson. Djiwandono, S. E. (2016). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gramedia Wiasara.
9. Dryden, Gordon and Vos. J. (2018). Revolusi Cara Belajar. Bandung: Kaifa.
10. Erlinawati. (2099). “ Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Dan Komunikasi Interpersonal Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam SMP Negeri 3 Rantau Utara Kabupaten Labuhan Batu”. Tesis
11. Foster. Helen and Cole . Jason (2018). Using Moodle Second Edition. USA : O’Reilly.
12. Hamid, A. (2009). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Medan: Unimed.
13. Heinich, R and Molenda. M and Russel, D. J. (2015). Instructional Media and The New Technologies of Instruction. United State: John Willey & Son.
14. Julismin. (2019). “Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Grafis Dan Kemampuan Awal Terhadap Hasil Belajar Meteorologi Dan Klimatologi Pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Geografi Semester II Universitas Negeri Medan.” : Tesis.
15. Karo-Karo, D. (2002). “Pengaruh Pembelajaran Menggunakan Media dan Kecerdasan Emosional Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA” Medan: Tesis Unimed. Tidak dipublikasikan.
16. Margono, S. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
17. Mayer, R. E. (2019). Multi Media Learning Prinsip-Prinsip Dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
18. Miarso, Y. (2014). Menyemai Benih Teknologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali.
19. Muchtaridi dan Justiana S. (2007). Kimia SMA Kelas X. Bandung: Quadra.
20. Muhammad, A. (2017). Komunikasi Organisasi. Yogyakarta: Bumi Aksara.
21. Nasution, S. (2018). Berbagai Pendekatan Dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
22. Pelatihan Manajemen Pembelajaran Berbasis TIK Tahun 2010 (MPB TIK 2010) Kemendiknas Direktorat Pembinaan SMA
23. Purba, Michael. (2017). Kimia SMA Kelas X. Jakarta: Erlangga.
24. Rada, R. (2010). Understanding Virtual Universities. USA: Intellect.
25. Rakhmat, J. (2014). Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
